Like everyone with a pulse I’ve decried the long-distance relationship (LDR) as, “a terrible idea,” “something I’ll never do again” and “worse than a return of epidemic smallpox”. But also like everyone with a pulse, I am a hypocrite.
One of the benefits of the LDR in which I’ve been embroiled for the last year has been the very thing that puts the LD in that LDR: My girlfriend lives in New York City. Before meeting my girlfriend I had spent time in New York, but I hadn’t gotten to know the place the way you do when you’re schlepping Whole Foods bags from Union Square to the Graham stop on the L line.
My CV – seven or eight five day stints in the city – does not make me an expert on all things Gotham, but those stints have given me some perspective, especially when added to an adult life that has seen me live in Barcelona, Athens, Los Angeles, Chicago, and Atlanta.
All that to say this: You can trust me as much as you can trust anyone who will remain the faceless author of a 900 word article comparing two cities.
Going into my year of quasi-New Yorkery, I had no reason not to like the place. In fact I had plenty of reason to like the place: I was considering graduate school there, my brother lived there, my girlfriend lived there, but I don’t like New York. Sure, there are more things to do, and you can walk everywhere, and the people are probably more interesting to talk to than the people in say, Kansas City. But there’s a reason that so many people say the same things about the place: “It sure is crowded. And doing anything is a pain in the ass. And my god is it expensive.” Usually people say those things right before they say, “But I love it,” because you know, that’s what people do. They love New York in spite of its wrinkles, its warts, and its $1500 a month studio apartments.
The reason people do this is the same reason that guy you know stays with that ugly girl he dates – the one who sucks the fun out of every room she enters. People don’t like to admit when they’re wrong. But my mission is not to bash New York. My mission is to sell you on the idea that Kansas City is a better place to live than you think. Consider the facts:
New York City’s main draws are: 1) things to do, 2) people to do them with, and 3) ease of doing them (you can walk or ride everywhere you go).
I’ll grant you that those are important reasons to live in a particular ‘burg, especially if one is under 40 years old.
The problem – the anti-draw, so to speak – is a significant one. The benefit of having “so much to do” is negated if one can’t do anything, whether because of cost, because everyone else wanted to see Deer Tick that Saturday, or because you can’t be in more than one place at once. Unless you’ve perfected a Star Trek-style transporter and haven’t told anyone, you bastard.
Last spring, after buying tickets one week before the show, I watched the indie/electronica band Miike Snow with 200 other people at Kansas City’s Record Bar. Ten days later, I was in Brooklyn visiting the other half of my LDR, and noticed that the band’s tour had wound its way to New York. But their show at Webster Hall (capacity 1400) had been sold out for months. I would have needed a permission slip signed by Michael Bloomberg – or a Derek Jeter bodysuit – to get a ticket.
One comparison does not make a rule. But the Miike Snow duality has served as a fine example of a phenomenon I’ve noticed to be true: The cultural events in New York are often similar to those in Kansas City, but in Kansas City we can actually attend those events. Throw in a rock bottom cost of living, ($700 for a two-bedroom, anyone?) and, when one engages in the cost/benefit analysis that comes naturally to mankind (Is this can of beans worth 69 cents? Is our relationship worth wearing a Zorro cape every Saturday night?), the results favor cities like our fair Kansas City.
Of course, all of my not-so-scientific analysis gets deleted like last night’s booty text if one has a trust fund or an Internet startup. If money isn’t a consideration, you should buy a penthouse apartment just off Central Park and see how many models you can get pregnant. My analysis of New York City and its relative disadvantages when compared to Kansas City should not substitute for actually going to New York City, or to any other city, for that matter. If you have the means, do it.
But if you don’t have enough money to live in New York while you’re in your twenties and thirties, I have good news: Kansas City is a better place than you think.